FCHOA Board PrimerApproval of new construction or additions to existing homes, and discussions of reported CR&R's violations consume most of the time at meetings. There are also often items of community interest on the agenda. We have, either unilaterally or in concert with other homeowners' groups, gone to bat to try to modify development plans that would negatively affect property in Flecha Caida. A notable example was in the early 1980's when the huge La Paloma complex was being planned. In this case we formed a coalition with a large number of other HOA's to protest the high density and hilltop defacement in the original plans and to ensure that down slope flooding the Finger Rock Wash would not inundate our roads and homes. With more than 22,000 signatures on a petition to modify the original designs, we were highly successful and La Paloma is a compatible asset to the central foothills. In the mid-eighties, we gathered with other neighboring groups to protest the proposed widening and straightening of River Road west of Craycroft Road, which would have opened created a major east-west artery at our front door. Again we won. We recently entered into another matter regarding a parcel of land adjacent to the east boundaries of Flecha Caida #3 near the Rillito River. An owner is asking to have a 16-acres parcel rezoned to build ten homes per acre. This is incompatible with the surrounding properties and could potentially cause serious flooding. We have written to all the concerned county officials protesting this proposal. Those who attended the Annual Meeting in April 2000 are aware of another project that we are working on. We hope to form small districts to make our streets safer by the probable use of some speed humps, signage and boulevarding where drivers tend to speed or fail to exercise caution. The streets in Flecha Caida are dedicated county roads, but we have worked successfully with the Department of Transportation for many years on many projects. We hope this will be one of them. SOME PROBLEMS WE CANNOT SOLVE From time to time a property
owners will have a dispute with his neighbors. We may not, by law, become
involved in these 'border wars', as we are often compelled to explain,
unless there is a breach of the CR&R's. When there is no violation of the
CR&R's, the parties involved must seek resolution via the civil statutes,
hopefully without going into court. Occasionally we get calls about
barking or wandering household pets. There is really nothing we can do
about this except contact the owner of the animal (if the individual is a
property owner), which usually has little effect. The best way to handle
this is to contact either the Sheriff's Department or Pima County Animal
Control. Another growing problem is the
increasing number of rentals in Flecha Caida. Most absentee landlords are
very responsible abut assuring that their tenants comply with the CR&R's,
but unfortunately there are many who seem not to care what happens on
their property so long as the checks come in. A sizable number turn the
property over to a management company or agent and apparently do not
include the duty of enforcing compliance with the CR&R’s in the contract.
Since we may deal only with property owners, this has resulted in some
difficult situations. If you should rent your property in the future,
remember that you have the ultimate responsibility for what happens on or
to it. Another area where there has
been an evolving problem over the years is the use of coolers and
–increasingly—heat pumps retrofitted on rooftops. In 1974, at the height
of the energy crisis, the membership voted to waive enforcement of the
prohibition of roof-mounted mechanical equipment on existing homes, with
the provision that such installations be pre-approved. This was mainly
because of the design of the ductwork. Over the years we have tried to
make these as unobtrusive as possible. We tried what came to be known as
“goat pens” to screen the coolers, but these often blew off in storms or
disintegrated. In any case, the cure was often uglier than the problem.
Currently, with the advent of new equipment with a lower profile, we now
approve them with a compatible color –usually the roof material. As with the coolers,
technological advances have dictated other ways of coping with things not
dreamed of in 1957. The Board, for example, heaved a massive sigh of
relief with the advent of the 18-inch satellite dish. These can easily
be concealed on a patio or surrounded by small plants and, if hidden from
public view, require no approval. Another ongoing problem is that
of our mailboxes. We solved one complaint from those who provide
emergency services by using reflective lettering on the boxes and on our
street signs. However, the mailboxes are constantly the victims of
careless drivers and, sadly, vandalism. We have tried several remedies
and hope to come up with a solution one of these years. There have been a number of
misconceptions over the years about what is actually in the CR&R's. One
that has caused a few problems is the building of two-story houses, which
are not prohibited. We always try to protect views and privacy, but with
the infill improvement of less desirable lots, we have granted more
variances and approved more multi-story homes as time passes. With our forty–year plus
history, we have many precedents for enforcement on a case-by-case basis.
What is accepted on one property might be totally unacceptable on
another. We attempt, but are not bound by any of the recorded documents,
to make all construction meet both the mandates of the CR&R's and the
approval of affected neighbors. This is possibly the most difficult
aspect of being a member of the Board. One must put aside personal likes
and dislikes as to the style of proposed houses and other matters and
produce solutions based strictly on what is in the CR&R's or sometimes
County zoning. The Board as a whole or one of
its appointed committees makes all decisions. No single Board member may
speak for FCHOA. We also depend upon our consulting architect and our
attorney for their valuable services, which have included a number of
successful litigations over the years. We do not enter into this lightly,
but will if necessary. We would all like to do more, for
example, to welcome new residents, keep up with what is going on in the
foothills community and many other matters, but monitoring 560 lots is a
time consuming task for the Board members, most of whom are very busy
professionals with more than full time careers in a number of fields. We can always use some extra
sets of hands and new ideas. We are restricted somewhat in what we can
do, as well as in how much we can spend. Even if you cannot devote the
several hours per month to be a Board member, we would appreciate your
help on the street project, welcoming committee or—maybe—finally getting
our Flecha Neighborhood Watch program off the ground.
In any event, this is who we are and what we do. It is
never enough and sometimes misunderstood, but whether you support us or
not, we are protecting your property rights and values together with our
own. As we enter this next millennium, we hope you will join us to
preserve the Flecha way of life. |